![]() 10/03/2017 at 18:10 • Filed to: Citroen CX | ![]() | ![]() |
Citroën CX (with suspension set low. It was this feature which had it banned in America for several years)
Yes, it’s the Mk2. I prefer that to the Mk1.
![]() 10/03/2017 at 18:45 |
|
Things that look more than 40 years old but are not.
![]() 10/03/2017 at 18:49 |
|
Of course, early ones were a bit more chromey and period-looking:
Still a super-cool design.
![]() 10/03/2017 at 18:51 |
|
Things that look 40 years old because they’re 40 years old
![]() 10/03/2017 at 18:54 |
|
Am I insane for thinking the Honda Civic looks like an updated Citroen CX?
![]() 10/03/2017 at 20:45 |
|
Fully agree. The mk2 CX is a timeless design, the mk1 shows it’s age a bit better due to all the chrome, but I still like both of them.
![]() 10/03/2017 at 22:19 |
|
They both have 4 wheels and slanty backs
![]() 10/04/2017 at 00:08 |
|
That’s how you do stance.
![]() 10/04/2017 at 05:34 |
|
why ban a car for suspension like that?
![]() 10/04/2017 at 08:05 |
|
Because headlights had to be fixed in a certain place. The same legislation banned steering lights. The CX’s lights would have been illegal anyway because not sealed beams.
The other reason is that adjustable suspension was evil, foreign and quite possibly Communist.
The SM had to go from this:
to this:
to keep the Americans happy.
![]() 10/04/2017 at 08:12 |
|
thank you.
![]() 10/04/2017 at 18:38 |
|
the freedoms of murica are actually quite limited.